It removes the last remaining reason you might plausibly choose The addition of XPath is especially significant. It also fixes a number of bugs that were present in XOM 1.0, uses less memory,Īnd is two to four times faster for many common operations. Version 1.1 maintains backwards compatibility with XOM 1.0 while adding a number of important new features including XPath queries, document subset canonicalization, exclusive XML canonicalization,Įxternal XSLT parameters, and xml:id support. How about a mutual fund that makes investment decisions by analyzing a company's public web applications to figure out which companies hire the pointy-haired and which don't?ĭual streaming/tree-based API for processing XML with Java. It used to be that only internal users suffered through such brain damage and poor design but with web apps everyone gets to see just how incompetent your team really is. Next year let's do a reverse keynote where the CEO and CTO of Proximus have to stand in front of the convention and listen to everyone in the audience tell them how to fix their broken system. Proximus did wrong, is not exactly the smartest viral marketing a company might do. Putting such blatantly bad design on display in front of an audience of 2000 alpha geeks, almost every one of whom could probably explain in intimate detail exactly what Relatively few people were able to chat about or report from the show in real time. Poor wireless access (the IE requirement was not the only problem) meant This had more than a little to do with the silence of my sites over the last week, as well as the paucity of reports from what was a quite interesting show for those who were there. Javapolis last week that wouldn't let anybody in unless they were using IE. You'll probably want to archive a copy or two now for testing purposes, as well as to use with sites like the Proximus wireless "access" point at Internet Explorer for the Mac at the end of next month. Microsoft is officially halting distribution of The XMLPull API for handling input documents, but is otherwise The enhanced class files generated by the bindingĬompiler use this runtime component both for actually building objectsįrom an XML input document (called unmarshalling, in dataīinding terms) and for generating an XML output document from objects The second part of the JiBX framework is the binding You can also skip the bindingĬompiler as a separate step and instead bind classesĭirectly at runtime, though this approach has some After running theīinding compiler you can continue the normal steps you take in assembling yourĪpplication (such as building jar files, etc.). This compiler enhancesīinary class files produced by the Java compiler, adding code to handleĬonverting instances of the classes to or from XML. Your source code into class files you execute the first part of the How does it manage this? JiBX uses bindingĭocuments to define the rules for how your Java objects are converted to Very high efficiency, but still allows you a high degree of control To perform the translation between internal data structures and XML with Your data to and from XML based on your instructions. The JiBX framework handles all the details of converting Lets you work with data from XML documents using your own class JiBX is a framework for binding XML data to Java objects. It falls into theĬustom-binding document camp as opposed to the schema driven This software is a turkey.ĭennis Sosnoski has released JiBX 1.0, yetĪnother open source (BSD license) framework for binding XML data to Java Mistake of focusing on how the developers view the project instead of how users see it.Įclipse 3.1.1 is required, but frankly I wouldn't bother. The whole project makes the classic open source I'd be extremely surprised if any actual user testing was done on this. Instead it looks like they simply made a checklist of features which were then implemented independently without any real integration between the people working on different pieces. It's not obvious to me that the programmers working on this had a clear vision of how an XML (or web services) editor should work. You feel like you're fighting with the tool rather than working with it. Both features and user interface don't seem to be closely tied to how XML is actually edited. As XML editors go, it's pretty weak, certainly not up to the level of Oxygen, for example. I've not been incredibly impressed with this. The Eclipse Project has released Web Tools 1.0, a collection of XML and Web Services editors for the open source Eclipse IDE.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |